Awaiting reviewer selection after revision reddit. View all Q&As on this topic Visit the Q&A Forum.
Awaiting reviewer selection after revision reddit. Answer this question .
Awaiting reviewer selection after revision reddit I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the manuscript to another journal”. it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。 7. Also, the second round took 8 months. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Now I am curious about what this might mean. There are so many submissions these days, sometimes editors have to reject good papers that could be strengthened after review. The main concern of the reviewer was to add the details in methods section and some amendments in the text. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Note that the time it takes for an editor to Plenty after one round of reviews, a couple after two rounds. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. If it’s not going through I don’t know what to do. It went to review three times, and every time, it was kicked back because I didn't have an SS Trust credit. 5. We made the changes requested in the minor revision. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Answer this question After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. However, today, The reason is that reviewer#2 refers back to the same old comments that he gave at the major revision stage (He just copied and pasted alll the comments mentioned in the major revision stage The article has been returned to reviewers after a major-revisions decision every time in my experience, both as an author and a reviewer. This change has occurred My journal submission status is still “awaiting reviewer selection” after nearly 3 months. A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. This change has occurred EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. This change has occurred I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Review Settings . Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. Check out the sidebar for intro guides. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. This change has occurred I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. This subreddit is temporarily closed in protest of Reddit killing third party apps, see /r/ModCoord and /r Please be civil, keep it on topic, and follow the subreddit rules and reddiquette. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. Now for the last Something like this: "The paper was initially given a 'minor revision' decision. It sucks when you get positive reviews with comments you can easily address, only for the editor to reject the I have submitted a revision to an elsevier journal after incorporating the suggestions from the reviewers. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever since I've contacted the journal twice and got the same response, that it is still awaiting reviewers and that I'll be notified once an update happens. The EiC at that time said they'll look If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Now I want to submit my manuscript to another journal, but it would be a duplicate submission in this situation. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. Reviews completed: 0 Review invitations accepted: 0 Review invitations sent: 2+ Why does it take too long for a reviewer to either accept o reject a revision invitation? and What should I do about this? What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 16 Mar, 2020 . 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做 Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Under review. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). 编辑很快做出决定。若未经审稿人评审（letter或correspondence除外），稿件几乎都会被拒绝。 6. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. It sounded like their "under review" meant Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. You can usually get things moving by sending a friendly follow up — I got one pushed through this way a month ago after it was “awaiting editor assignment” for 2 months. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to [email protected] Submitted my paper. The new reviewers recommended rejection based on points we argue were incorrect. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. It is just guessing. Know what the reviewers have asked you to do. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Both reviews were positive about the future of the article. But the status of the paper is showing "under review" again. The status of the paper changed several times. Reviewer 1 recommended acceptance with minor revisions and Reviewer 2 wanted major revisions before considering it further. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. Anyway, they seem to have found the required number of peer reviewers now, and your I submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. The VA hotline just confirmed my supplemental claim is at pending final review. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". Half a year thrown away. The EiC at that time said they'll look Especially for articles that might not be great fits, AEs are having a hard time finding reviewers and getting them to get reviews in on time. This change has occurred After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. These status should not be taken seriously. Because the editor requested 2 reviewers for this paper (the default for JGR-Space Physics), the status of the paper reverts back to “Contacting” because the system still desires another reviewer. This change has occurred • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". A sudden change of status could also mean that the Associate Editor is facing challenges in I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" If you received reviewer comments, then you would be able to resubmit after resolving those. This change has occurred Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). The submission is now with the author. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. Is this I have a manuscript at Nature Communications that went out to review. For "good" business journals the rejection rate is something like: 30% desk rejected by the editor before going to review, 40-60% rejected in the first round of review, 10-20% rejected in subsequent rounds of review, only 5-10% papers submitted are actually published. Then I revised and resubmitted. What do I do? So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. While the reviewers had explicitly mentioned that there were minor issues, with about four issues a piece, the editor had requested a major revision. The second one gave a more thorough review, raised some good questions, and said the general idea is good, but made no comment about whether the article One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. Does it mean the work will be After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". This change has occurred I contacted the journal several times, but there was no reply. The status after 3 days . What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 1. This change has occurred A major revision was submitted to a journal. My paper underwent a revision. If it passes it may be assigned to a subject matter expert Review Editor, who does another desk review. Awaiting EA (Associated Editor) decision. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. The editor seemed enthusiastic about the paper, and asked for the revisions before acceptance. Note that an Edit link appears Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Related reading: After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So the thing is, I have been looking quite often on the Elsevier tracking system and it seems that many reviewers were invited (2+), after 2 months and only 1 accepted to review. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than But, now it is showing Awaiting Review. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". But, while the RE is deciding, the software I'm familiar with defaults to "Assigning reviewers". I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. I got minor revision in the first round of review. Reviewer 2 hates me and I‘m sure I won’t be able to The reason is that reviewer#2 refers back to the same old comments that he gave at the major revision stage (He just copied and pasted alll the comments mentioned in the major revision stage 投了一篇IF较低的SCI，两个审稿人明确建议小修后接受，也较好回答；但主编给了大修， 今天我终于修改完上传了，投稿状态就立马显示：awaiting reviewer selection，借该平台咨询大神们，主编是选择原来的审稿人还是换审稿人？谈谈你们的大作审稿阅历吧。 The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. This was for an I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. However, I definitely remember the last two: Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. . After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". If the RE thinks it is worthy, they assign reviewers. Then, a few days ago, the status went to "review complete". After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is Hello all, I have an article under review after a major revision with a journal. While the differences in average review time between one field and another are staggering (one month for the Whole process in neuroscience, 8 months in engineering), usually it's something like you don't even see the choice of the editor and maybe it's 3-4 days between when it gets to With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. They likely have requested another review. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 months but still has not submitted his/her report which makes But some people say "Awaiting Reader Selection" is different from " "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. So, there is a second “Under Review” line item above this, indicating the time that a second person agreed to review the manuscript. You might get a totally different reviewer pool, though. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. " This status has not been changed for a month. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. The reddit for students of Concordia University of Montreal, Quebec / Le reddit des étudiants et étudiantes de L'université Concordia Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. Peer Review in Progress. - Prolific will auto-approve anything that’s still sitting there, awaiting review, at (or possibly just after), the 3 The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. But there is still no response. Awaiting reviewer selection. This change has occurred [email protected] Submitted my paper. john tizzile john tizzile. g. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. I checked this AM and the status is "awaiting resubmission". This change has occurred I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. I am really Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. If it is not realistic, move on to another journal. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. I want to know how long will this status last. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 论文小修后await. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Many common questions are answered in the Fiverr Help Center and in the Fiverr TOS, which are linked in the subreddit wiki, which also includes links to resources for new sellers looking for tips on getting started the right way. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. Post any questions you have, there are lots of redditors with admissions knowledge waiting to help. I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. Handling the R&R is important. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. After 6 weeks I got a decision to reject it though the editor-in-chief acknowledged that the peer my paper went from "under review" to awaiting EIC decision after about 5 and a half weeks. 2023 at 12:35. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Now, again it . This change Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 査読者の決定（返答待ち） Awaiting Reviewer Scores. But my question is as below. I re-submitted the paper after incorporating these changes in the manuscript (I work in Biology field). It’s month seven and currently it’s at Co-EIC after first revision. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Sometimes the handling administrator or editor are on holiday or busy. I've published in medical journals, in physics/engineering journals and in neuroscience ones. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. It seems like 5 weeks is a very short time for it to be peer-reviewed, but almost 6 weeks under review seems like a long time for them to just desk reject it. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. The manuscript was sent back to the reviewers as it was a major revision. I was wondering about the A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. ScholarOne: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four weeks. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. When I asked about my status, the editorial manager said that the handling editor is still assessing whether they would send my manuscript for review. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Now, after that reviewer completed the review, that status A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). The initial peer reviews pointed out some flaws, so we were invited to submit a major revision. You said you recommended rejection twice now, and somewhat harshly because you perceived fatal flaws (that I assume you don't believe can be addressed in a revision). Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. My personal definition of major-revisions as a reviewer is that I'm asking the author to do additional experiments or analysis, but if they do that work, the paper is suitable for publication. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. The table shows a blank row. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. , if one of the original reviewers was generally happy with your revisions and recommended acceptance (or minor revisions), but the other reviewer was not satisfied and recommended rejection. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Hi. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. 1. This change has occurred I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. 査読者への依頼待ち. a) Is it However, there was one recently that wasn’t approved exactly at the 3 week mark, but was approved a very few days after that date. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. Reply reply The Reddit Law School Admissions Forum. 査読者の選出待ち. View all Q&As on this topic Visit the Q&A Forum. Not sure what the difference is. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. This change has occurred If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. I had one that took 3 weeks, an individual amnesty. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. A week after submitting that, I did another individual paid form 1. Yeah just send the journal a message. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. This change has occurred Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. In the first notification, I got a major revision. IMPORTANT NOTE: Any comments with links to Fiverr will be It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". This change has occurred I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Then I revised and It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. Mine was a bit of an exception. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it A few days ago, the status said, “Awaiting Post Screening Review. If only one reviewer agrees to review and all the others In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. I’m currently at 90% and already have migraines service connected at 0%. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. This can happen, e. Some editorial systems give the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. Nothing seemingly wrong, it just took that long. How long does this phase generally take? How long should one wait before reaching out to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. For a major revision typically the Maybe. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". This change has occurred However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. The title says it all. What can this mean? The platform is Hi Chase. Pretty much the best outcome one can hope for in my field (biomedical science) when submitting to a decently high IF journal, I think? Do most of the post peer review rejections with these journals come after the first round of review? As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. The comments were entirely new. Editorial review team inadvertently sent the revised paper to new reviewers instead of previous reviewers. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets The under review date changed after 25 days from the first Under Review Reply reply More replies. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Posted by u/Mountain-Ad-4557 - 17 votes and 29 comments After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status has been stuck in "Under Review" since submission. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. The reader may still be an admin staffer who conducts editorial screening before passing it to the editor. Today it went back to "awaiting I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). Awaiting Initial Packet Review Awaiting Assignment to Scroll Awaiting X Approval; List ID X##-FY; X days in DoD approval cycle Awaiting selection for publication of orders published: SO# XXX; Date Other unique pit stops include: Awaiting Case Manager Review Awaiting AGR control grade Awaiting surgeons office Hi. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. The other Journal is back after first review. same "review complete" status but different date. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a paper (meta-analysi) to a journal and it was sent for peer review the next day. ” So wasn’t sure if my packet (submitted back in February) is finally being finalized, or if I need to wait it out a little longer with a few more steps in the process. A delay does not mean that it will be a bad review, and AEs are often not great with the system and leave "awaiting assignment" even if some reviews already came in. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Comment. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. They said a decision has been made but it’s awaiting final review. Really depends on the journal and the editor. About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. The Elsevier Tracking system shows the following: Detailed Reviewer Activity. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Or check it out in the app stores The first reviewer stated that if the article is re-written, it could be published. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I think the first step is to see how realistic it is to resolve the reviewer comments. The best place on Reddit for admissions advice. Is it a bad sign? It means nothing. I submitted my manuscript to a journal. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". I have previously published in the same journal I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Awaiting Reviewer Selection. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Is this the same stage as pending decision approval? If I win this one it should push me to 100% P&T. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. " Does it mean that my paper will go through After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. This change has occurred Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. ecbrcxunssuubpbhyzynufwqnukivryrfneuluiyro