Awaiting reviewer invitation after revision example. Learn more about this process and what you should look for.

Awaiting reviewer invitation after revision example , it can be math, comp sci etc. 5. I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision 22. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" Solid Mechanics monograph example: deflection results are same for different materials? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Did the editor find new reviewers After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 01. – For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. If the paper is really as badly written as you are saying, then most likely I would spend less than an hour in the review and reject it. minimum would be either two or three depending on the publication but the associate editor might have After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. responses:-If. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural For example, you may specify which field the topic of your paper belongs to (e. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. 5 Accept 2024. Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh review is sought. 22. . At the same time, badly written papers are low-effort for the reviewer. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Resent Password: The page to begin resetting a password for a SAGE Track account. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. Recently. I was hesitant to remind them, but luckily it got accepted after a year. All the reviewers overall appreciated the content and the usefulness, but also suggested corrections (varying from minor to major) : typos, better title and abstract, reorganizing the material, better exposition at certain places, adding more benchmarks; that need to be After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. An example of Comments to the Author: “This paper was reviewed by three experts, who After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Conflict of Interest: If you have been asked to review a manuscript and have a potential conflict, then please consult the Editor. This change has occurred After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. Checking compliance with length requirements, if any. list. First of all, do the review ahead of schedule, as soon as you can, and before the arbitrary 6 week deadline. There can be multiple rounds of Review and cite MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING protocol, troubleshooting and other methodology information | Contact experts in MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING to get answers It may include for example: Checking for missing or broken files. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if additional input is needed), or drop some (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version). Go to your SAGE Track journal’s login page Journal Profile; Journal Title: Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery: Journal Title Abbreviations: QUANT IMAG MED SURG: ISSN: 2223-4292: E-ISSN: 2223-4306 For Manuscripts For Response Letter new For LaTeX For Annual Review and Tenure For Books new. Thanks! Here’s a process and then a format that I recommend in this case. 论文小修后await. 小小小西瓜 2023-06-30 Is my current status "awaiting reviewer selection" mean that it is ready for review? 2023-02-17 Minor revisions based on reviewers' comments, three reviewers 2023-03-03 Responded to reviewers' comments After 5 months I received a "Major revision". Grant Editing ; Translation ; Publication Support. ) Did you receive the decision letter after the first round and resubmit it? Select. Usually, those papers seem to be unanimously rejected, and for most part are low-effort for the reviewers. " Does it mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. The status of the paper changed several times. Should I decline the review invitation in this case? I would love to review this piece because it is my main research topic. How long does this phase generally take? How long should one wait before reaching out to the administrator? Thanks for the advice in advance. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 23, major revision on 10. This change has occurred Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2024-11-18 10:37:38 Awaiting reviewer invitation on May 30, 2023. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. This change has occurred After review you may get two options major or minor revision. 17 major revision 22. This will help us the AE to find other reviewers in a timely manner. Bowling Green State University reviews each After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If you think that there is a chance that you would give the manuscript a preferential treatment, for example due to a Then on September 19th, AE invited another batch of reviewers for review, and the invitation results were returned on September 25th (again, all reviewers rejected the invitation). 08. Review guidelines. Because "reviewer10" is written, I would assume that the paper was reviewed by at least 6 reviewers. (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version). Respond to a Review Invitation. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. Sorry! nothing found for. I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript, like Awaiting Reviewer Invitation, or it's different, and the reviewing process is started already. This change has occurred I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. " In the Action Column on the left, click on "View Abstract. 09. If a manuscript is rejected, do not give up. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. The paper was then sent to two new reviewers. The task is then passed back to the editor or For papers with significant revisions, the editor may choose to send the article back out for peer review. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. This change has occurred If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. Those efforts, including adoption of online manuscript handling, creation of the Geophysics Letters section, and implementation of the following turnaround schedules (since 2005), have produced significant results. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Therefore, please only make this recommendation if you believe all the major concerns can be addressed in one revision. This change has occurred After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". There is a high probability that new reviewers will For example, you may specify which field the topic of your paper belongs to (e. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where A positive response may be more likely if you tailor the invitation to the reviewer; If there is a specific reason why you are inviting them, then include a note on this toward the beginning of the invitation. 17 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. But here the chances are 50:50 depending on the reviewers comments. Or that what a reviewer thinks is major is actually minor or vice versa. completed. However, the editor asked me to improve my abstract, introduction, and structure (as a second major In these cases we’d request that you accept the review, and be appropriately critical, per below. After sending a reminder, I quickly found a reviewer, and received their feedback within one month. 8 Awaiting AE Recommendation This situation generally occurs when the editor invites the original reviewers but someone declines the invitation, resulting in not meeting the minimum requirement for the number of reviewers. On the Reviewer Main Menu, click on "New Reviewer Invitations. 25: Accept Difficulty was fine, but the speed was a bit slow. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. If the reviewer did not catch the novelty of your approach, you should have highlighted it more. This change has occurred 2022. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. 15 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2022. Now I am curious about what this might mean. Recently, it was For example, you may specify which field the topic of your paper belongs to (e. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. This change has occurred A reviewer may not read an article in detail in the first pass. Provide two samples for reference: Paper 1: Application of data fusion in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS): Accept As Regular Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". The identity of the authors and content of submissions must remain strictly confidential to those outside the review process until the manuscript is published. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. 2022. contained. If you are unable A reviewer may not read an article in detail in the first pass. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. For ex: Let's say the paper requires some revision based on reviewers. 10-Apr-2022 submit 23-May-2022 Major Revision 06-Jun-2022 Revised 08-Jun-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 06-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 07-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Scores Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | Strive: Author: CX330 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Duration of Peer Review: 0. 28 submitted 22. Scientific Editing . 01 Accept I waited for 3 months for the first round of review, always awaiting reviewer assignment. automated. The full manuscript will be accessible after the review assignment is accepted. . It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Re-submitted after revision on 7. To check the status of your submission in o ScholarOne: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation . However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. about academic proof-reading, what to do in this situation? 4 "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 5. I have revised the paper according to the referees' comments. So we sent query to the editor. This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to accept the manuscript, request revisions, or reject it. 29: Awaiting Decision 2022. Dear Dr. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Awaiting reviewer assignment on June 3, 2023. The reviewer forgot to respond, so I sent a reminder letter. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2019-07-16 19:55:33 10-Apr-2022 submit 23-May-2022 Major Revision 06-Jun-2022 Revised 08-Jun-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 06-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 07-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Scores Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | Strive: Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. Awaiting AE recommendation on June 18, 2023. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. One of the referee suggested minor revision, while the other suggested major revision. I had to wait for one month to start the review process after making revisions. 1. Logging In 1. 11 Major Revision 2023. Then I revised and resubmitted. Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. the. Checking central formatting requirements, e. In this section: NEW! Featured Author Support; Tracking your submission; My paper has been accepted – what next? Appeals and rebuttals; BMJ Article Transfer Se During this period, we got a chance to make minor revision. You could send out an e-mail, but im pretty sure it is in fact still stuck with a reviewer. 221128 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 221202 Reviewers My paper underwent a revision. 12. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". 5 Submit Revision 2023. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). "awaiting reviewer invitation" means that it is awaiting an A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. Today it went back to "awaiting Review and cite MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING protocol, troubleshooting and other methodology information | Contact experts in MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING to get answers 22. Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). i work in a journal, and sometimes reviewers ask us more time because theyre busy, other times we need to find a new reviewer, and this whole process takes a lot of time "awaiting reviewer invitation" means that it is awaiting an invitation to be reviewed. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. , it may be conditionally accepted. – • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. There is rarely an accepted rubric for what constitutes minor vs major, and editors have the prerogative to accept a reviewer's comments, overrule them (so to speak), reject them outright and find another reviewer, or tweak them to make them make So if you log in to check on progress several weeks after submission and find your manuscript at this stage, it doesn’t necessarily mean that no action has been taken. Assess and 20-May-2024 Submitted 01-Jun-2024 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 07-Jul-2024 Awaiting AE Decision 09-Jul-2024 Minor Revision (2 weeks) 21-Jul-2024 revised manuscript submitted 22-Jul-2024 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 02-Aug-2024 Awaiting AE Decision (w/o Awaiting Reviewer Scores status) 06-Aug-2024 Awaiting Decision Approval 07-Aug-2024 Minor I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. same "review complete" status but different date. Once you receive a review invitation, please respond at your earliest convenience even if you cannot review. However, if the status returns to "Editor assigned," it means that the feedback received from the reviewers necessitates further revisions or modifications. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 6. Could simply be the editor disagreed with what a reviewer said. Will reviewers focus on Can I use bootstrapping for small sample sizes to satisfy 5 SAGE Track Login Page Login Page Tabs Log In: The page to log into SAGE Track and access additional resources. This mainly reflects two problems. This change has occurred 221116 Major Revision 221127 Awaiting Admin Processing 221128 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 221202 Reviewers Assigned 230120 Awaiting Recommendation 230124 Accept Translation: 220909 Awaiting Editor assignment 220917 Reviewers Assigned 220927 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 221026 2023. 5. This change has occurred . however is to try to address the reasons why you weren't understood. Journals have target acceptance rates ("pages to fill") that may influence this as well - for example, through head editors pressuring AEs (this is, thankfully, not very common). Add additional templates. 29 submitted after Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2020-07-29 14:56:15 A general-level journal is of the same level of DCDS, may be slightly better. Moreover, authors may reveal more information after a revision, and reviewers finally 'understood' the paper, and hence, recommend a reject or an accept. This change has occurred • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. forward. Reviewer. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. ) and how the first round review went (e. 3. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. I sent my research work to an sci indexed journal. The first reviewer has explicitly stated that they are satisfied with the changes made. Learn more about this process and what you should look for. 26 awaiting reviewer invitation Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | ltcugb: Author: ltcugb Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0. 14: Reminder 2022. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. links. 4 . After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 22 awaiting admin processing 5. 2. 0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review: Reviewed 2023-02-18 15:22:27 After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". " This will help you decide whether you are able to review the manuscript. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The identified reviewers are being formally invited to review your manuscript. I revised and resubmitted. are. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. After conducting additional experiments and making careful modifications, we resubmitted the paper on April 10th. 11. I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four weeks. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Hi everyone. 24, accepted on 12. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. These status changes indicate that the journal is working on getting your A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Please note the timeframe: you must respond to the invitation within three (3) days and complete the review within ten (10) days. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Do not put the blame onto the reviewer; try to correct the mis-communication on your end. On April 20th, we received an acceptance email. , line numbers, if required by the journal. 30 Accept After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 0. This change has occurred Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. 19 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023. status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has **SAMPLE REVIEWER INVITATION EMAIL (Author)** Dear Professor _____, You have recently submitted a chapter for possible inclusion in the upcoming book, **** Insert book title here ****. On February 28th, we received the first round of revisions, which included two major revisions and one minor revision. 05. Geophysics is now a leader among I recently received the reviews/comments for an article submitted few months back to a journal. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed Popular Articles. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. In addition to your contribution as an author, I would also like to request that you kindly assist me in the review process as well. g. So, why has it returned to 2022. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. Submitted on 11. However, it was under review for 5 months. This change has occurred I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 11 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 7. Was your notation non-standard, for example? And if so, was it completely and clearly explained in Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. This change has occurred After submitting. person. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. ) Did you receive the decision letter after the first round and resubmit it? As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. For Manuscripts For Response Letter new. The major revision took 1 month and 21 The manuscript status has changed from "Under Review" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. next. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their cover letters, but we also leave it at the Editor’s discretion to select appropriate reviewers. 14: Revised 2022. 13. The status after 3 days . Then it will take probably one month to get your work accepted. I have received minor comments (only a few text corrections) from the referee who suggested major revision at the 1st review. 0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review: Reviewed 2024-12-26 10:25:43 Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2024-11-13 16:29:49 Journal of Geographical Sciences Submitted After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". " I'm unsure what these status changes It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. This means that potential reviewers have Possibility of acceptance when the editor clearly states that another revision will likely lead to a rejection. The first round of reviewer assignment took a relatively long time, almost 2 months. If you are unable After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. ) Did you receive the decision letter after the first round and resubmit it? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting At the 1st review, the referees' have written positive statement. round of reviews or jump to editorial decision immediately – this mostly depends on the magnitude and nature of the revision. Translation: 21. 6. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 30: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. In that case, will it be communicated directly to us (by the managing editor) Write a review: Reviewed 2023-02-18 15:22:27 After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". This change has occurred Whether you are looking for information on designing an academic or scientific article, constructing a scholarly argument, targeting the right journal, following journal guidelines with precision, providing accurate and complete references, writing correct and elegant scholarly English, communicating with journal editors or revising your paper in light of that Yup, agree. 221128 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 221202 Reviewers 2023. If so, go ahead. This change has occurred Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. I firmly believe that the I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Popular Articles. awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee Communicate clearly in submission, review and revision. How to review revised manuscripts. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: At least 4 reviewers have been selected, but less than 4 have been invited. to. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. email. in. 24 awaiting reviewer selection 7. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred The Awaiting Reviewer Invitation queue is where manuscripts appear if the SE has selected reviewers but has not yet sent the invitations. What could be Prior they told me that revisions in this stage only take 2-3 weeks (and last time they had to switch out a reviewer because they took so long, after my requests). Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. This change has occurred I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. One of the new reviewers made several rounds of incorrect comments. In the second pass, he/she may review the paper in more details if an editor is thinking of pursuing a paper. This change has occurred Subject field: Quartiles: Rank: Percentile: Category: Engineering Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. 2 Accept with Minor Revision 2022. 10. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Reviewer 2024. If the reviewer does not respond to the invitation, that is a strong indication that the reviewer is I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. 04. After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". A week has passed since I submitted the revision, but the status in ScholarOne remains unchanged. If you have a known conflict, then you should always decline the review invitation. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. 03. 1 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2021. After review you may get two options major or minor revision Finally hired, the processing time in the middle was really long, but the actual modifications were not too strict. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". 8 Minor Revision 11. Took more than 9 months. This change has occurred Hi. 8 Awaiting AE Decision 11. 2 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Journal After about six months and 3 revisions, of which 2 were major and 1 was minor, I re-submitted the article. What does this I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, it has now changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores". Accepted on June 23, 2023. To check the status of your submission in o EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Finally hired, the processing time in the middle was really long, but the actual modifications were not too strict. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. 0 month(s) Result: Rejected SAMPLE 2. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After 14 days, I received the decision [communication] that both the reviewers agreed that I had addressed their questions and that the paper could be published. Or maybe you're asked to revise the manuscript extensively. workflow . 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. 01-08—Paper Submitted 03-10—Awaiting Reviewer Selection 06-04—Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 06-17—Awaiting Reviewer Scores 07-31—Awaiting Recommendation 08-04—Major Revision 08-23—Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 10-03—Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10-20—Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10-28—Major Revision 11-05—Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 11 [TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL] Hello, you are Visitor Number 202536 on this page. As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. 07. Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting reviewer assignment," and now "awaiting reviewer invitation. However, after the third revision, I received another request for revision, and this time it was from a third reviewer. This change has occurred Geophysics editors and the SEG publication staff have made strong efforts to reduce the review and publication turnaround times. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society's journals: Reject wit I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Step 10. A reviewer is just a random sample of your future readers. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. 8. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". 2021. Create An Account: The page to begin creating a new account in SAGE Track. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept!" Kevin 2022-09-29 As of now, it I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. 16: Awaiting Recommendation 2022. 28 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024. [name], On behalf of _____, I am writing to invite you to serve as an external reviewer of Bowling Green State University’s _____ major, in the spring/fall of 20__. On the other hand, I feel it may be inappropriate that he sent me the piece after submitting it to a journal. Ok, so you’ve agreed to review the paper. 2024-08-02: Awaiting EIC Recommendation, Major Revision 2024-09-02: Resubmitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2024-09-03: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024-09-11: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-09-16: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2024-09-17: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-12-04: Awaiting EIC Decision 2024-12-04: Accept The journal is very good, and the After submission, I got a major revision decision from two reviewers. We value your expertise in the area and your opinion on the manuscript you review, including its quality, novelty, and importance. In the case The most likely scenario seems to be that the editor send your work after minor revision to the referee who was asking for it. qkoxs cekuge ztno znfexs fpuugtqf ayhggq vouy flbu kmyobym vwhli